A SYSTEM DYİNG OF ITS OWN DECEİT

GÜNDEM

 

Agent Grace Salazar and Her Tyranny of Injustice in Dr. Henry Abdo’s case

 When the System Betrays the Innocent

 

Justice should be blind, impartial, and firm in its pursuit of truth. But in some cases, it becomes a tool, twisted into a weapon of oppression, sullying reputations and livelihoods in the service of law enforcement. Dr. Henry Abdo's case is a grim reminder of how crooked methods, reckless accusations, and judicial complicity can destroy a man's life without evidence or accountability.

 

A Case Fabricated on Falsehood

 

Lebanese philanthropist. Dr. Henry Abdo was ensnared in a web of deceit by a rogue FBI agent determined to make him the “fall guy” in an alleged conspiracy to commit a fabricated financial crime. He was jailed without charges instead of being afforded due process, with his fundamental rights grossly disregarded.

 

Worst still, this crooked agent did not only constantly harass him but even perpetrated perjury, using tainted evidence to lock Dr. Abdo in judicial peril. Instead of fairly examining the case, the federal judge, William P. Dimitrouleas, closed his eyes to clear proof of perjury, ignored Abdo's rights, and issued a verdict on unsubstantiated charges.

A Courtroom Mockery: Justice Denied

Rule of law mandates evidence, but in Dr. Abdo's, none was available, merely fake allegations, judicial apathy, and a unified effort at conviction without evidence. With mounting evidence of government malfeasance, the judge declined to dismiss the fraudulent case, declined to hold accountable the FBI agent Grace Salazar, and declined to let Dr. Abdo have access to his own files; files that would have exonerated him entirely.

Had justice prevailed, the case would have been dismissed immediately. Instead, the system collaborated against the truth, imprisoning a man for the wrong offenses.

Judicial Misconduct: When Judges Protect Corruption

The most scandalous aspect of this case was the federal judge's intentional inaction. It is not just judicial incompetence with regards to overlooking perjury, but complicity in justice. A judge's role is to serve justice and discover truth, but for Dr. Abdo that role was cast aside in order to whitewash government abuse and unlimited authority.

By failing to reject the fabricated charges, not holding the FBI accountable, and legitimatizing a worthless conviction, the judge became an accomplice to tyranny. Justice wasn't dispensed, it was desecrated.

Emergency for Judicial Accountability

The case of Dr. Henry Abdo is not an isolated one, it's one manifestation of an ailing system where prosecutorial abuse, corruption in law, and judicial neglect thrive unchecked.

This case demands an independent inquiry, a reversal of wrongful decisions, and, most importantly, accountability for the people who abuse the law.

Unless and until the system is made to take responsibility for its wrongdoing, no citizen is ever safe from being the next casualty of injustice.

 

--------------

 

The Corruption of Justice: When Prosecutor Jonathan Bailyn Create Crimes in Dr. Henry Abdo’s Case

 In justice halls, truth is supposed to be paramount. But in instances such as these, truth is warped, evidence is disregarded, and reputations are systematically ruined, all behind a veil of legal immunity. The Dr. Henry Abdo case is a chilling example of the power an unfettered prosecutor wields to warping the system into fabricating a false case against an innocent man and leaving him in legal limbo without reason.

A False Case Constructed on Deceit

Dr. Henry Abdo, a well-known philanthropist and humanitarian, was placed at the forefront of an embarrassing legal witch hunt, which was instigated by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Bailyn. Rather than seeking justice through evidence, this scam prosecutor decided to make up every aspect of the case, creating an outlandish tale of economic crime with no basis in fact.

The charges against Dr. Abdo were not weak, there were no charges at all. No credible evidence linked him to any misconduct involving money. But concerted legal machinations guaranteed that he was stuck in the system without being able to clear his name from a case based on outright fantasy.

A Judiciary That Turned Its Back on Justice

Even with the prosecution's clear defects, at least four separate judges considered the charges, but none threw them out. What this indicates is a shocking reality:

Judicial tolerance for frivolous cases to be heard. The undermining of equity, as judges were not willing to review clearly false assertions. The lack of responsibility, with no consequences for the prosecutor's duplicity.

Rather than acknowledging the sham charges from the prosecution, the courts remained passive while Dr. Abdo was held under detention without charge, deprived of his access to important files which would prove his innocence, and dispossessed of his right to defend himself.

Prosecutorial Immunity: A Shield for Corruption

One of the most frustrating realities in such cases is the doctrine of prosecutorial immunity; a legal protection that insulates government lawyers from responsibility, even when they deliberately abrogate the principles of justice.

But in Dr. Abdo's case, the misuse of authority went beyond. The prosecutor's conduct weren't errors in judgment; they were bald-faced acts of deceit done with malevolence. Fabricating charges isn't an act protected from suit, and Dr. Abdo is reported to be preparing to sue his accuser personally.

If this case goes forward, it can be a precedent; it's a precedent that breaks the notion that prosecutors can lie at will, resulting in accountability where there was none before.

The System's Failure: A Lesson in Tyranny

Dr. Abdo's case serves as a harsh reminder that legal power in the wrong hands amounts to tyranny.

Unchecked prosecutors can ruin lives with malicious charges.  Judges can facilitate corruption by failing to act. Victims of abuse at the hands of the law have few options for justice.

Unless these failures in the system are fixed, no citizen is ever safe. A single corrupt official with an axe to grind can use the law as a weapon, turning innocent citizens into criminals with nothing more than deceptions and courtroom tricks.

This case is not merely about one man; it's about the integrity of the justice system itself. If the courts will not recognize wrong, if prosecutors will still operate free of check, and judicial immunity is still an impenetrable shield against corruption, then the law is no longer a force for justice.

It is a tool for oppression.

The Road to Justice

Dr. Abdo's lawsuit may be just the beginning of accountability. But beyond that, the legal system has to change.

Prosecutorial misconduct has to have real consequences. Judges have to be held accountable for allowing wrongful prosecutions.  The doctrine of immunity has to be reevaluated when deceit is established.

Until those things occur, wrongful accusations, unfettered legal abuse, and corrupt prosecutions will be a blight on American justice.

And nobody should be quiet about it.

 

------------------

 

The Corruption of Justice: Federal Judge, William P. Dimitrouleas Who Betrayed the Law in Dr. Henry Abdo’s Case

 A Case Study in Tyranny

In an era where justice is supposed to serve the people, far too often, it is manipulated by those in power twisted beyond recognition, weaponized against the innocent, and used to silence voices that threaten entrenched interests. The case of Dr. Henry Abdo stands as a damning indictment of a system that punishes the wrong people while protecting the real culprits.

The Judge Who Betrayed the Law

Justice requires evidence, fairness, and impartiality, yet these principles were utterly disregarded in the sentencing of Dr. Abdo. In a decision unparalleled in its audacity, American Federal Judge, William P. Dimitrouleas delivered the harshest possible sentence: 168 months, despite the fact that the alleged crime would normally result in zero jail time.

This miscarriage of justice unfolded right before more than 10 witnesses, who saw and heard an operative blatantly lying under oath, repeatedly. Instead of dismissing the sham lawsuit, restoring Dr. Abdo’s reputation, and holding the perjurer accountable, the judge embraced deception and handed down a tyrannical ruling that defies basic legal norms.

A Prosecutor’s Reckless Campaign of Lies

If justice were truly blind, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Bailyn would be the one facing trial, not Dr. Abdo. With zero evidence, zero credibility, and zero regard for the truth, this government charlatan persisted in fabricating baseless accusations, poisoning the judicial process at every possible opportunity.

He exploited legal loopholes to ensure that Dr. Abdo was denied access to files that could prove his innocence. He misled every judge who heard the case, spinning falsehoods without accountability. He pursued a relentless vendetta, dragging an innocent man through the courts with no legitimate basis for prosecution.

It is no surprise that Dr. Abdo will be filing lawsuits against the prosecutor personally, challenging prosecutorial immunity, a doctrine far too often abused to shield misconduct. If successful, this lawsuit could set a precedent, forcing accountability onto those who wield power irresponsibly.

Banks, Lawyers, and Institutions: A Web of Corruption

Outside of the courts, the financial elite did their part in attempting to destroy Dr. Abdo. Some banks, in collaboration with other dark interests, engineered attempts to bankrupt and discredit him for many years. Their actions included:

Denying financial transactions that could finance his enterprises. Intentionally misstating his financial accounts to simulate scandal. Coordinating efforts with prosecutors and government agents to mute opposition.

But the assault on Dr. Abdo didn’t stop with economic sabotage, it took a deadly turn. There are credible allegations that he faced attempted murder, poisoning, and systematic obstruction of justice, all while being denied basic healthcare. These horrifying tactics aren’t the actions of legitimate institutions, they are the hallmarks of a deeply corrupted system, one that exists not to uphold the law, but to protect those in power at all costs.

The Price of Injustice: $150 Billion in Losses

Dr. Abdo potentially suffered losses exceeding $150 billion, a sum that puts into perspective the extent to which this institutional vendetta has been going on. But this case is not just about money; it is about a fundamental failure of governance, a judicial machine so compromised that it doesn't serve the people anymore but works to oppress them.

It is a direct attack on the values of fairness, honesty, and human dignity.

A Judge’s Betrayal & The Enemies of Humanity

Perhaps the greatest moral outrage in this case is the judge’s personal betrayal. Dr. Abdo had placed trust in this individual, believing that his decades of judicial service would translate into wisdom and integrity. Instead, he was deceived, blindsided by a ruling so irresponsible, degrading, and vile that it defies comprehension.

This ruling does not uphold justice, it serves the enemies of humanity, contemptuously disregarding basic human values, legal principles, and the very laws meant to protect citizens.

The Fight for Justice Must Continue

Dr. Abdo is not backing down. His lawsuits will target: The operative responsible for orchestrating false accusations. The prosecutor who weaponized lies against him. The banks and financial entities complicit in his destruction. The governmental and private institutions involved in criminal activity ranging from threats to attempted murder.

This legal war will expose the underbelly of corruption, challenging not only the individuals responsible but the entire system that enables such abuse.

But this case is bigger than one man, it is a wake-up call to all who still believe in justice. If the courts remain unchallenged, if prosecutorial immunity continues to shield misconduct, and if corrupt financial institutions keep destroying lives without consequences, then no citizen is truly safe.

This is not just a battle for one person's innocence, it is a battle for the soul of justice itself.

The world watches as the courts decide whether to stand up and regain a modicum of moral credibility or succumb further to lawlessness.

The world waits anxiously.

 

----------------------

 

The Corruption of Justice: Federal Judge, William P. Dimitrouleas Who Betrayed the Law in Dr. Henry Abdo’s Case

 

A Case Study in Tyranny

In an era where justice is supposed to serve the people, far too often, it is manipulated by those in power twisted beyond recognition, weaponized against the innocent, and used to silence voices that threaten entrenched interests. The case of Dr. Henry Abdo stands as a damning indictment of a system that punishes the wrong people while protecting the real culprits.

The Judge Who Betrayed the Law

Justice requires evidence, fairness, and impartiality, yet these principles were utterly disregarded in the sentencing of Dr. Abdo. In a decision unparalleled in its audacity, American Federal Judge, William P. Dimitrouleas delivered the harshest possible sentence: 168 months, despite the fact that the alleged crime would normally result in zero jail time.

This miscarriage of justice unfolded right before more than 10 witnesses, who saw and heard an operative blatantly lying under oath, repeatedly. Instead of dismissing the sham lawsuit, restoring Dr. Abdo’s reputation, and holding the perjurer accountable, the judge embraced deception and handed down a tyrannical ruling that defies basic legal norms.

A Prosecutor’s Reckless Campaign of Lies

If justice were truly blind, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jonathan Bailyn would be the one facing trial, not Dr. Abdo. With zero evidence, zero credibility, and zero regard for the truth, this government charlatan persisted in fabricating baseless accusations, poisoning the judicial process at every possible opportunity.

He exploited legal loopholes to ensure that Dr. Abdo was denied access to files that could prove his innocence. He misled every judge who heard the case, spinning falsehoods without accountability. He pursued a relentless vendetta, dragging an innocent man through the courts with no legitimate basis for prosecution.

It is no surprise that Dr. Abdo will be filing lawsuits against the prosecutor personally, challenging prosecutorial immunity, a doctrine far too often abused to shield misconduct. If successful, this lawsuit could set a precedent, forcing accountability onto those who wield power irresponsibly.

Banks, Lawyers, and Institutions: A Web of Corruption

Outside of the courts, the financial elite did their part in attempting to destroy Dr. Abdo. Some banks, in collaboration with other dark interests, engineered attempts to bankrupt and discredit him for many years. Their actions included:

Denying financial transactions that could finance his enterprises. Intentionally misstating his financial accounts to simulate scandal. Coordinating efforts with prosecutors and government agents to mute opposition.

But the assault on Dr. Abdo didn’t stop with economic sabotage, it took a deadly turn. There are credible allegations that he faced attempted murder, poisoning, and systematic obstruction of justice, all while being denied basic healthcare. These horrifying tactics aren’t the actions of legitimate institutions, they are the hallmarks of a deeply corrupted system, one that exists not to uphold the law, but to protect those in power at all costs.

The Price of Injustice: $150 Billion in Losses

Dr. Abdo potentially suffered losses exceeding $150 billion, a sum that puts into perspective the extent to which this institutional vendetta has been going on. But this case is not just about money; it is about a fundamental failure of governance, a judicial machine so compromised that it doesn't serve the people anymore but works to oppress them.

It is a direct attack on the values of fairness, honesty, and human dignity.

A Judge’s Betrayal & The Enemies of Humanity

Perhaps the greatest moral outrage in this case is the judge’s personal betrayal. Dr. Abdo had placed trust in this individual, believing that his decades of judicial service would translate into wisdom and integrity. Instead, he was deceived, blindsided by a ruling so irresponsible, degrading, and vile that it defies comprehension.

This ruling does not uphold justice, it serves the enemies of humanity, contemptuously disregarding basic human values, legal principles, and the very laws meant to protect citizens.

The Fight for Justice Must Continue

Dr. Abdo is not backing down. His lawsuits will target: The operative responsible for orchestrating false accusations. The prosecutor who weaponized lies against him. The banks and financial entities complicit in his destruction. The governmental and private institutions involved in criminal activity ranging from threats to attempted murder.

This legal war will expose the underbelly of corruption, challenging not only the individuals responsible but the entire system that enables such abuse.

But this case is bigger than one man, it is a wake-up call to all who still believe in justice. If the courts remain unchallenged, if prosecutorial immunity continues to shield misconduct, and if corrupt financial institutions keep destroying lives without consequences, then no citizen is truly safe.

This is not just a battle for one person's innocence, it is a battle for the soul of justice itself.

The world watches as the courts decide whether to stand up and regain a modicum of moral credibility or succumb further to lawlessness.

The world waits anxiously.

 

 

 

The Manufactured Lies: Andrea Torres, A Paid Hack Writer In Dr. Henry Abdo’s Case

 How a Corrupt System and Media Colluded Against a Lebanese Humanitarian

In such a world where truth is weaker than ever, corruption spreads in the shadows, in the courtroom, in government offices, or in the media itself. The tale of Dr. Henry Abdo, a Lebanese businessman and humanitarian, is not one of simple false accusations, it is a screaming testimony of institutional betrayal and cowardice of those who fear progress.

A Paid Hack Writer's Part in the Dispensation of Disinformation

Even before the ink was dry on the spurious claims against Dr. Abdo, a self-styled journalist, Andrea Torres, an Emmy award-winning media professional, rushed to blare the falsehoods, being nothing more than a mouthpiece for the desperate ones wanting to ruin his image.

She distributed disinformation with no research or diligence effort, not even taking time to investigate the most basic facts in the case. She sold fake stories that were at the service of the convenience of the interests of those who were threatened by Dr. Abdo's intentions to implement the world's biggest human-centered bank in 128 countries. She sold journalistic standards for fear-mongering propaganda intentions, ensuring that Dr. Abdo's story was packed with lies before he even had a chance to defend himself.

Her brazen reporting was no mistake, it was done intentionally, to scare and discredit a man who was on the verge of reforming global finance for the good.

Government Deceit and an Unashamed Judiciary

The Department of Justice, in its hopelessly grasping attempt to uphold unjustified charges, issued a horrifically inaccurate statement, one full of numerical dishonesty.

The figures between 200 investors were totally erroneous. The financial data that was submitted were entirely fabricated. All the so-called statistics had only one single aim, to authenticate a bogus prosecution.

Reality came out in court.

Yesterday, Dr. Abdo achieved a chilling judicial victory, not because justice has been served, but because the system's lies disintegrated in front of 13 witnesses.

The accuser perjured herself, again. Dr. Abdo conclusively demonstrated that each government word was a lie. Even the judge conceded that the so-called "misrepresentation," the basis of their manufactured case, was not misrepresentation.

In any rational judicial system, such a case undermined by facts and eyewitness accounts would have fallen apart right away. But instead, this corruption goes on, demonstrating just how broken the legal machinery has become.

 A System That Shields Fraud, Rather Than Justice

Dr. Abdo isn't going anywhere. He's working on lawsuits against those who did this, including:

The doctor who fed him false charges. The lawyer continued to table a campaign of lies in the courts. Banks that were implicated in efforts to bankrupt and discredit him. Government and private institutions implicated in obstruction of justice, harassment, and withholding of medical treatment, an unconscionable abuse of his basic human rights.

This is not legal action alone, this is a battle to expose one of the greatest uses of governmental power in abuse in recent history.

A Statement That Will Haunt the Department of Justice

When the Department of Justice rushes to issue its next damage-control press release, it will be faced with one unavoidable fact:

Its most recent announcement was a sheer travesty, full of phony statistics, laughable inaccuracies, and outright lies that disintegrated the moment they were challenged in court.

This isn't about one man being innocent, it's about whether or not truth is still possible in a system hell-bent on extinguishing it.

 

 

Dr. Henry Abdo and The U.S. Department of Justice:

A System Dying of Its Own Deceit

For a justice system that boasts about dispensing justice, the Department of Justice has perfected the art of deception. Instead of providing fairness, it is a graveyard for the truth, where specious charges, statistical manipulation, and judicial laxity are repackaged as official statements, desperate attempts to cling to stories long discredited.

Nowhere is this corruption more apparent than in the case of Dr. Henry Abdo, a man railroaded by blatant charges and outrageous prosecutorial abuse. At each turn, the DOJ's unwillingness to respect reality has been exposed, yet they insist on not abandoning their sham case as it unravels before them.

Yesterday, in the open eyes of the court room, their key argument unraveled. Their key charge, "misrepresentation", was dismissed out of hand by the very judge presiding over the case. And yet the DOJ continues still to peddle discredited figures, cooked-up investor statistics, and sidesplitting misestimates, each more disconnected from reality than the last.

The irony? The U.S. Department of Justice is now on trial, not in the court room, but in the court of history.

And when future generations glance back at its record, they will not be wondering whether it was for justice, but for how long it thought it could desecrate it.